Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
You never disappoint
Thu Aug 30, 2018 8:23pm

"I'm glad you've acknowledged the likelihood that BC and SK didn't sign the 1901 docs in person because they weren't accessible. Hmm, I wonder where they could be? No witnesses in 1901, only signed documents.......mainly copies past from person to person. I'm D Brand had their US address in his rolodex."

I feel a silent mode coming lol Good luck in D.R.

  • Re: Spoiling a Good Yarn...Anonymous, Thu Aug 30 8:15pm
    The Nov 1901 signature matches the undocumented scribble on a piece of paper that anyone could have planted in the Pinkerton file. How convenient. I think that sums up the similarity. I'm glad you've ... more
    • what I wrote vs. what you postedDaniel Buck, Fri Aug 31 4:21am
      What I wrote: "People do put each others names on documents, on petitions, open letters, for example, especially in an early 1900s frontier region where not every one is accessible. Another even more ... more
      • CNNChrisV, Fri Aug 31 5:20am
        Lets see the estancia horse purchase. Never seen it You forgot to mention the July 18, 1901 document the pair sign giving D Brand authority to work on their behalf. Very important for your theory.... more
    • You never disappoint — ChrisV, Thu Aug 30 8:23pm
Click here to receive daily updates