Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Daniel Buck
what I wrote vs. what you posted
Fri Aug 31, 2018 4:21am
71.114.65.83

What I wrote: "People do put each others names on documents, on petitions, open letters, for example, especially in an early 1900s frontier region where not every one is accessible. Another even more common example is census information provided by one person for an entire household. Doesn't mean the people on the form do not exist; they just weren't there when the enumerator came calling."

What you posted: "I'm glad you've acknowledged the likelihood that BC and SK didn't sign the 1901 docs in person because they weren't accessible."

I said nothing about BC&SK not signing 1901 documents. In fact, the evidence that BC&SK were in Argentina in 1901 is based on a great deal of evidence, including estancia ledger books reflecting 1901 livestock purchases, 1901 brand filings, and Pinkerton investigations in New York and Buenos Aires of their travels to Argentina in 1901.

  • Re: Spoiling a Good Yarn...Anonymous, Thu Aug 30 8:15pm
    The Nov 1901 signature matches the undocumented scribble on a piece of paper that anyone could have planted in the Pinkerton file. How convenient. I think that sums up the similarity. I'm glad you've ... more
    • what I wrote vs. what you posted — Daniel Buck, Fri Aug 31 4:21am
      • CNNChrisV, Fri Aug 31 5:20am
        Lets see the estancia horse purchase. Never seen it You forgot to mention the July 18, 1901 document the pair sign giving D Brand authority to work on their behalf. Very important for your theory.... more
    • You never disappoint ChrisV, Thu Aug 30 8:23pm
      "I'm glad you've acknowledged the likelihood that BC and SK didn't sign the 1901 docs in person because they weren't accessible. Hmm, I wonder where they could be? No witnesses in 1901, only signed... more
Click here to receive daily updates