Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
Mark A Mszanski
Wrong again Lumpy
Wed Sep 5, 2018 4:47am
108.53.201.169



If you look at the original ( even as a cheap xerox ) of the building the joints are present to the right of the photo. The photo is taken with with the sun blasting almost directly into the faces of Butch, Etta and Sundance and has been essentially Xeroxed so all the grain is way off on it. If you look over her head in your close up you can see building joints in the corner and follwing the roof line. As well , Your not measuring anything . Impossible to get measurements between these two photos. - So sighting that the sizing is somehow off from a net new roof line ( completely rebuilt) is true -it is foo and should be - the sizing from the top of the joist to the roof would be off and should be as they most certainly lowered the profile of the roof and replaced the whole top section of the cabin due to rot.. Your trying to attain perspective against a completely rebuilt structure compared to much older structure. That dog does not hunt.

In the end, your argument is not a good one. A national landmark that has been rebuilt in order to preserve some of the timbers from the original was probably all they could do . The building you see today is net new against the original. Which has the American windows in it as per all observers who visited the home. The provenance of the Tea party photo is still in tact. That is most important.


  • Turn out the Lights.....ChrisV, Tue Sep 4 2:54pm
    Right photo, is obviously the Tea Party photo. Left photo is the west side of the cabana being restored. The additional room was added after Tea Party supposedly. The door is obscured by the... more
    • Wrong side of the houseBob Goodwin, Wed Sep 12 6:25am
      Chris, this is all the wrong side of the house see my original post reprinted here" Initially I have believed that the Jinetes photo of the riders, and the Tea Party photos were taken on opposite... more
    • Apples to Apples - Oranges to OrangesBob Goodwin, Thu Sep 6 9:37am
      Dan has a point, it does no good to compare the post 2005 cabin with either of the two early 1900's photos. The cabin was rebuilt. Better to compare the early photos with pre-reconstruction photos.... more
      • Lincoln LogsChrisV, Thu Sep 6 9:48am
        Ill check these out. Thanks Bob. Ive compared both pre and post and don't see a lot of difference. Most of the logs are same. They've been rechinked, but from what I can see, same length etc... for... more
    • early 1900s apples vs early 2000s orangesDaniel Buck, Wed Sep 5 12:09pm
      Chris, Let's start at the beginning. You are comparing apples and oranges. You are comparing the early 1900s Wild Bunch cabin with an early 2000s completely reconstructed cabin, using new and old... more
      • Time to admit...ChrisV, Sun Sep 9 6:47am
        Id really like to hear your excuses for what Ive shown. If you cant do that, step up and admit your wrong. The cabin is not the Butch/SK cabin
      • Cabin now out of the equation ChrisV, Fri Sep 7 6:23pm
        No need to look at cabin anymore. If its not their cabin, is it even Butch, SK, and Etta? Hmmmm should I look into that too dan? ;) FYI For Mark* I photoshopped this picture. Its not real.
      • Did you not like the photo I posted?
      • So Im not confused anymoreChrisV, Thu Sep 6 4:58am
        I know my drawing isn't the best, but thats the basic layout correct? Im a slow guy so if I missed something please correct me. I don't want to be confused anymore. Id like to spend my time playing... more
      • I seeChrisV, Wed Sep 5 3:16pm
        ok. I think I have it right....So like this?
        • RE:Bob Goodwin, Wed Sep 12 6:41am
          This is the front side of the cabin, not the back side of the cabin where the newer side addition was made. Also, it depicts the cabin before the addition of the bedroom was made to the right side of ... more
    • RE: Turn out the lightsAnonymous, Wed Sep 5 6:12am
      Chris, Thanks for really looking into this. I think your research clears up a lot of the misinformation and people's 2-second analysis on the subject. Regards Brett
    • Wrong again Lumpy — Mark A Mszanski, Wed Sep 5 4:47am
      • Mark*ChrisV, Wed Sep 5 5:09am
        Ive missed you buddy. Ready to answer some geography questions? Anyway, your excuses are way off. The sun is not "blasting into the faces of Butch, Etta, and Sundance" Do you know what shadows are... more
        • The New Structure Mark, Wed Sep 5 5:31am
          You should go to google earth and look at the new structure that is not comparable to the old structure as they are two different structures entirely. Please refer to the previous discussions on this ... more
          • Re: The New Structure ChrisV, Wed Sep 5 6:02am
            We can go with the pre construction pics if you want (which I included on the joints and corners). Those are 100% in the right location, as I think the remodel is as well. Look at "The Riders" photo... more
            • 2d Mark A Mszanski, Wed Sep 5 6:49am
              The original Tea Party photo is by definition in 2d not 3d . There are several problems with the image. I say image as it is not the original photo. I have had two photographers look at it whom I... more
              • The Provenance is BS. Proof it ! (nm)Pat, Thu Sep 6 7:02am
              • Re: 2d ChrisV, Wed Sep 5 7:15am
                Yes, its a crappy copy. It is a picture of three people in front of a cabin that slightly resembles the Cholila cabin. Again, refer to "The Riders" for a period correct comparison. The roof is... more
                • I agree Mark A Mszanski, Wed Sep 5 7:35am
                  I agree with your Rocket scientist - They are not the same structure - They got that right - Angles and all - Simply because it is a rebuilt structure - Not even close - Same site ( google earth ) ,... more
                  • Re: I agree ChrisV, Wed Sep 5 7:47am
                    Im glad you agree with rocket scientist as he said there is no way they are the same building.
                    • Rocket Scientist Mark A Mszanski, Wed Sep 5 7:51am
                      For clarity , He is correct - the new building and the old original are not the same building - The Tea party photo (image) is as per it's provenance and origin of BC , SK and EP in my opinion.
Click here to receive daily updates