Daniel Buck
Re: Magician's Trick?
Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:08am
71.163.191.37

Rocky,
The crisis in forensic science, here:

https://www.johnlocke.org/update/the-ongoing-crisis-in-forensic-science/


And an excerpt from a separate 2018 report:
========================
Fingerprint [identification] susceptible to analyst bias, and has a high false-positive rate.

Firearm/toolmark identification currently falls short of the criteria for foundational validity.

Bite-mark evidence lacks any scientific foundation.

Impression/pattern analysis of shoes, tires, etc. unsupported by statistical surveys, and may mislead jurors.

Fiber analysis no set standards.

Hair analysis a recent review by the FBI found that 90% of cases involving hair analysis contained erroneous statements.
====================

  • Magician's Trick?Rocky, Thu Jun 13 6:28am
    I had no idea forensic scientists used magician's tricks. I am pretty sure I'd accept their analysis (e. g. in Chris's article) over a claim that it is a trick. Besides, in my opinion, it does look... more
    • Re: Magician's Trick? — Daniel Buck, Thu Jun 13 9:08am
      • Magician's Trick?Rocky, Thu Jun 13 8:06pm
        Daniel, Interesting article summing up a single lawyer's report in a conservative think tank website. Am I supposed to believe that police do not use fingerprints anymore? Let alone many of the... more
        • Re: Magician's Trick?Daniel Buck, Fri Jun 14 3:11am
          Rocky, Thanks for reading. Criticism of forensic science and as well the entire criminal justice system is among those rare efforts supported across the political spectrum, from conservative to... more
          • Re: Magician's TrickRocky, Fri Jun 14 9:02am
            Dan, I am sorry I was not clear in my previous response. I have no problem with the conservative or liberal nature of the article. I have a problem with someone using a media article as scientific... more
            • Re: Magician's TrickDaniel Buck, Fri Jun 21 3:08am
              Rocky, "We need to fix forensics. But how?" Washington Post, 20 June 2019 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/06/20/we-need-fix-forensics-how/?utm_term=.8784299e0973 The writer solicited... more
              • Re:Magician's TrickRocky, Mon Jun 24 5:14pm
                Dan, Are you sure you aren't the magician here? I appreciate the article in Scientific American. It's another media piece, regardless of where it was published, Scientific literature is from peer... more
                • Re:Magician's TrickDaniel Buck, Mon Jun 24 6:29pm
                  "I also did some follow-up with Chris. I find it disingenuous for you to write an article debunking facial recognition and photographic analysis AFTER you had received a copy of the analysis and... more
            • Re: Magician's TrickDaniel Buck, Fri Jun 14 10:00am
              Rocky, not to put too fine a point on it but people criticizing aspects of forensics are themselves scientists. In fact, one of the major reports was issued by the US National Academy of Sciences.... more
          • We've already been down this road. I told you the lines were done by me. NO MAGIC TRICK. Just the photo the Sanpete Messenger chose to use. From April 18, 2017: Dan, Though not posted in the Sanpete... more
            • no, not forgetting at allDaniel Buck, Fri Jun 14 7:06am
              Chris, I'm looking at "Photo Comparison," Melissa R. Cooper, 7 November 2016, the report the police sketch artist did for you. On p. 2 is a triptych of photos, two of Cassidy and one of the supposed... more
              • You are forgetting something elseChrisV, Fri Jun 14 7:11am
                I gave you that report in confidence. You agreed. By posting information from it makes you a liar and you may be asking for trouble.
                • trouble, trouble here in River CityDaniel Buck, Fri Jun 14 7:20am
                  The Melissa R. Cooper report you released to the Utah media is confidential? The world has turned up side down.... more
                  • Buck is a LiarChrisV, Fri Jun 14 7:28am
                    The information you just spouted came from the report you said you would keep confidential . It did not from the two articles you just posted. Good try.
    • Re: Magician's Trick?Daniel Buck, Thu Jun 13 6:32am
      Forensic science is loaded with tricks, not to mention bogus science, like blood splatter and bite evidence.
Click here to receive daily updates