"if we don't get 11 points from 13 games then we are down no matter what anyone else does." and "we probably need 50 points to stay up"
In context, it's clear that the second of these two statements is there to back up the first. The first is also the subject of the posting, and this also provides evidence that this is the major proposition.
If you simply say "Disagree", it's a perfectly reasonable inference that you're disagreeing with the major, rather than the subsidiary and supporting, point of the post.
The fact that your post made very little sense as a disagreement with the major point of the post is no evidence of anything. Half the posts on here make very little sense.
you need to sharpen your reading/comprehension skills (do schools still do that?) I quote "46 may well be enough given the number of teams in the mix" As we have already established that the number... more
Why should it be clear? Oakwood Exile,Thu Mar 1 17:55