gasroom.co.uk - Your initial reply rather betrayed your subsequent claim

Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.

that you don't know the identity of "HW" but I shall take you at your word.

A new regime may well be on the way in, but it is not there yet. Furthermore you a second guessing much of the detail. Far worse is your eagerness to attack the Trust which suggests you have an ulterior motive. You don't seem prepared to even give it a chance.

Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.

To the gasroom ed — Bilversack, Mon Jun 25 17:09

thank you, and you know why
- Thanks for that — HW, Mon Jun 25 20:35
  
  With transparency like this you should consider joining the Trust. Oh, you already have? No, sorry, you can't tell us. I understand.
- - Why are you attacking the Trust for a perceived — Tlazolteotl, Mon Jun 25 21:14
    
    lack of transparency and not Steve Hayes? He remains the owner of WWFC after all and has been silent since last July.
  - - Because we hoped a new regime would be better (nm) — Sammy, Mon Jun 25 21:25
    - - Steve Hayes is still the owner... — BD, Tue Jun 26 07:18
        
        ..and can therefore dictate what announcements are made and when. Only judge the Trust regime if/when a takeover has been completed and in operation for a few weeks.
      - In my opinion, a somewhat complacent view (nm) — Sammy, Tue Jun 26 07:34
        
        Complacent how? — Floyd, Tue Jun 26 12:37
      - You utter utter tool (nm) — JcL, Mon Jun 25 22:53
      - I feel satisfied in the belief at the moment — My Only Wycombe, Mon Jun 25 21:48
        
        that the Trust has told us as much as is wise at this point. Paranoid individuals like you do not help matters.
      - Paranoid is an extreme term — Sammy, Tue Jun 26 07:35
        
        And a little ironic when it's parroted about (not necessarily by you) by people who like to shout "I TOLD YOU SO" at every possible opportunity when the votes in 2004 and 2009 come up.
      - The new regime as you put it hasn't started yet — Tory Goon, Mon Jun 25 21:39
        
        And frankly if you are so thick that you cannot get the simple concept of a non disclosure agreement then there really is no helping you.
      - A NDA does not prevent *all* comms. Just financial details. (nm) — Sammy, Tue Jun 26 07:32
        
        An NDA prevents whatever it prevents — Tory Goon, Tue Jun 26 08:17
        
        You've obviously never beta tested anything. Everything in the beta is under NDA, including normally the very fact that you are part of the beta...
      - What new regime? — Tlazolteotl, Mon Jun 25 21:33
        
        Why are you answering the question on someone else's behalf?
      - Because this is a forum, not a private conversation (nm) — Sammy, Tue Jun 26 07:30
        
        I don't have a problem with you providing an answer — Tlazolteotl, Tue Jun 26 09:46
        
        it was just your use of the word "we" that interested me. By the way, you have only answered my second question.
        I think HW and I share the same views on this one... — Sammy, Tue Jun 26 10:13
        
        ... though I have no idea who he/she - or indeed any of you - are. I assumed your first question was just your usual facetiousness. There is clearly a new regime on the way in, which in my opinion... more
        Who do you think you are? — Lee Hagger, Tue Jun 26 13:18
        
        that you deserve to be told things that have nothing to do with you at this stage?
        Your initial reply rather betrayed your subsequent claim — Tlazolteotl, Tue Jun 26 10:33
        Watch it, or MoW will call you paranoid! — Sammy, Tue Jun 26 10:53
        
        I genuinely don't know who HW is, but it's very clear we share the same views on the Trust's decision to stay schtum. I am a lone ranger on here, and that's the way I'd like to keep it. You're... more
        You may wish to make a virtue of being a lone ranger — Tlazolteotl, Tue Jun 26 14:36
        
        and challenging power but you are being unfair on the Trust. They have no power at the moment as far as ownership of WWFC in concerned. I don't recall you challenging the power of Steve Hayes over... more
        I accept your charge of being a hypocrite... — Sammy, Tue Jun 26 15:10
        
        ... but, to be trite for a second, two wrongs don't make a right. I also accept your charge of being impatient. But I will gently remind you of a point I made elsewhere on this thread... the very... more
        Thank you for the clarification(s) — Tlazolteotl, Tue Jun 26 15:17
        
        I don't accept your point about criticism of your impatience coming from those that were ignored in the summer 2009. I am not sure I see any correlation / relevance in the two positions. The Trust... more
        Do the Trust really have a choice? — Bilversack, Tue Jun 26 11:52
        
        Bearing in mind their existence is solely concerned with the long-term well being of the club? Let's say they don't accept Hayes' work, and they decide to spill all, come out and say exactly what is... more
        I trust the Trust — trousersnail, Tue Jun 26 12:43
        
        I'm right behind Mr Bilvers, I'm also fully behind the Trust's position (although I have no idea what it is) It appears that all concerned are playing a waiting game, see who blinks first. And... more
        I agree...the pressure is very much on Steve Hayes — BD, Tue Jun 26 13:49
        
        to get this sorted ASAP (same goes for the WASPS deal). Incidently London Wasps have extended their early bird Platinum season ticket price deadline by two weeks, in recognition of supporters... more
        I admire the articulate way in which you've argued — JSwwfc, Tue Jun 26 11:45
        
        your points, and to an extent I sympathise with some of them, particularly with your assertion that any role for Ivor Beeks, as chairman for example, would be potentially damaging. However, I'm not... more

Click here to receive daily updates

Return to the front page of the Gas Room - www.GASROOM.co.uk