Lease this WebApp and get rid of the ads.
9/11 Mastermind Zakheim: Hijack the Hijackers Tool
Tue Sep 20, 2011 14:18
72.201.39.41

9/11 Mastermind Zakheim: Hijack the Hijackers Tool Misused
The planes that hit the World Trade Center buildings had remote control capability designed to regain control of a hijacked plane. Instead, the tool, overseen by Dov Zakheim, was used to ensure that the planes hit their target, given that the hijackers were mere amateurs.

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

http://pesn.com/2011/09/20/9501917_9-11-Mastermind-Zakheim_Hijack-the-Hijackers_Tool_Misused/Dov_Zakheim_Pentagon-pulpit_two-fingers_300.jpg
Dov Zakheim at a Pentagon press conference

FULL REPORT?/

We've all heard rumors that the two planes that flew into the World Trade Center on 9/11 were made remote-control capable, and that this capability was most likely used to help ensure that the planes hit their targets, given that the hijackers did not have enough experience to do it themselves, and were merely part of the ruse to make the attacks appear to be instigated by Muslim Terrorists, rather than by the true terrorists, who wear expensive suits and are part of the military industrial complex.

But what I didn't realize until today, when watching a video, Dov Zakheim 9 11 Mastermind, is that the remote control system proposed for these class of planes (not yet implemented as standard equipment) is with the ostensible purpose of being able to take over a plane when the pilots are incapacitated, or to regain control of a flight if it is hijacked - to "hijack the hijackers".

Dov Zakheim's SPC International provided the flight termination system and Command Transmitter System aboard the two planes. This technology has existed for several decades, used primarily for drones, but also able to be fitted on heavy aircraft. Systems Planning Corporation designs, manufactures, and distributes highly sophisticated technology that enables an operator to fly by remote control as many as eight different airborne vehicles at the same time from one position, either on the ground or airborne. (Link)

The SPC website gives the following description of their capabilities:

"SPC’s Command Transmitter Systems (CTS) provides remote control and flight termination functions through a fully-redundant self-contained solid-state system."

The glaring question, therefore, becomes, Why wasn't this system used to regain control of the planes and land them safely -- as was supposed to be the purpose? Instead, the system appears to have been used to ensure -- through remote control -- that the planes hit their targets.

You and I know the answer to this question, and it has to do with the massive conspiracy involved in this entire operation, and is added to the long list of similar questions.

Why didn't the NIST and 9/11 Commission reports test for explosives, or even consider the possibility, then there was extensive evidence that explosives were used:
Building 7 falling at free-fall speed, which could only happen if the supporting structure was removed by demolition charges. Buildings 1,2 falling at near free-fall speed.
Recordings of explosions.
Squibs shooting out in advance of the falling structure.
Vertical rows of windows visibly obliterated in Building 7 just before it begins collapsing.
Thousands of eyewitness accounts of explosions.
Molten metal both before and after the buildings collapsed.
Sheered metal in the wreckage consistent with demolition charges being used.

Microspheres in the dust, consistent with demolition.
Lumps of steel in the wreckage.

Thermitic residue in the dust, a signature of high-grade demolition.
(conclusion: NIST and 9/11 Commission reports were cover-ups and complicit)
Why was the building wreckage disposed of so rapidly when it should have been kept for analysis, being a crime scene?
Why was more money spent on the investigation into Bill Clinton's escapades with Monica Lewinsky than was spent investigating 9/11 by the Commission?
That, of course, is a very brief listing, off the top of my head, as an illustration of a point.

SPC portrays itself as "...a great contributor to national security," when in reality, they appear to have been a key player in enabling the worst attack in U.S. history for nefarious purposes of undermining U.S. security, going to war, dissolving civil rights, setting up a police state, all in contravention to the U.S. Constitution. High treason. Orwellian double-speak. Those who beat the drums of war against terrorism are themselves the terrorists.

Here's the brief video pointing to Dov Zakheim as the 9/11 Mastermind.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlNQTG8B6hw


http://pesn.com/2011/09/20/9501917_9-11-Mastermind-Zakheim_Hijack-the-Hijackers_Tool_Misused/
You are here: PureEnergySystems.com > News > September 20, 2011


9/11 Mastermind Zakheim: Hijack the Hijackers Tool Misused
The planes that hit the World Trade Center buildings had remote control capability designed to regain control of a hijacked plane. Instead, the tool, overseen by Dov Zakheim, was used to ensure that the planes hit their target, given that the hijackers were mere amateurs.

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News


Dov Zakheim at a Pentagon press conference



We've all heard rumors that the two planes that flew into the World Trade Center on 9/11 were made remote-control capable, and that this capability was most likely used to help ensure that the planes hit their targets, given that the hijackers did not have enough experience to do it themselves, and were merely part of the ruse to make the attacks appear to be instigated by Muslim Terrorists, rather than by the true terrorists, who wear expensive suits and are part of the military industrial complex.

But what I didn't realize until today, when watching a video, Dov Zakheim 9 11 Mastermind, is that the remote control system proposed for these class of planes (not yet implemented as standard equipment) is with the ostensible purpose of being able to take over a plane when the pilots are incapacitated, or to regain control of a flight if it is hijacked - to "hijack the hijackers".

Dov Zakheim's SPC International provided the flight termination system and Command Transmitter System aboard the two planes. This technology has existed for several decades, used primarily for drones, but also able to be fitted on heavy aircraft. Systems Planning Corporation designs, manufactures, and distributes highly sophisticated technology that enables an operator to fly by remote control as many as eight different airborne vehicles at the same time from one position, either on the ground or airborne. (Link)

The SPC website gives the following description of their capabilities:

"SPC’s Command Transmitter Systems (CTS) provides remote control and flight termination functions through a fully-redundant self-contained solid-state system."



The glaring question, therefore, becomes, Why wasn't this system used to regain control of the planes and land them safely -- as was supposed to be the purpose? Instead, the system appears to have been used to ensure -- through remote control -- that the planes hit their targets.

You and I know the answer to this question, and it has to do with the massive conspiracy involved in this entire operation, and is added to the long list of similar questions.

Why didn't the NIST and 9/11 Commission reports test for explosives, or even consider the possibility, then there was extensive evidence that explosives were used:
Building 7 falling at free-fall speed, which could only happen if the supporting structure was removed by demolition charges. Buildings 1,2 falling at near free-fall speed.
Recordings of explosions.
Squibs shooting out in advance of the falling structure.
Vertical rows of windows visibly obliterated in Building 7 just before it begins collapsing.
Thousands of eyewitness accounts of explosions.
Molten metal both before and after the buildings collapsed.
Sheered metal in the wreckage consistent with demolition charges being used.
Microspheres in the dust, consistent with demolition.
Lumps of steel in the wreckage.
Thermitic residue in the dust, a signature of high-grade demolition.
(conclusion: NIST and 9/11 Commission reports were cover-ups and complicit)
Why was the building wreckage disposed of so rapidly when it should have been kept for analysis, being a crime scene?
Why was more money spent on the investigation into Bill Clinton's escapades with Monica Lewinsky than was spent investigating 9/11 by the Commission?
That, of course, is a very brief listing, off the top of my head, as an illustration of a point.

SPC portrays itself as "...a great contributor to national security," when in reality, they appear to have been a key player in enabling the worst attack in U.S. history for nefarious purposes of undermining U.S. security, going to war, dissolving civil rights, setting up a police state, all in contravention to the U.S. Constitution. High treason. Orwellian double-speak. Those who beat the drums of war against terrorism are themselves the terrorists.

Here's the brief video pointing to Dov Zakheim as the 9/11 Mastermind.



The video concludes: "The possibility of use of these brilliant technologies developed and deployed by SPC certainly deserves careful consideration in any full and impartial investigation of what actually took place on 9/11."

AlienScientist also posted an excellent expose video which addresses the remote control pod that appears to have been added to these two planes, and how that equipment might have been added on the day of the attack.



Read Zakheim's bio at Wikipedia. If he's not the mastermind, he certainly should be on the short list of culprits for planning and executing the 9/11 attacks. Zakheim was CEO of SPC, International Division, in 2001 until he was appointed by Bush to be Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller of the Pentagon.

A year prior to Sept. 11, 2011, Zakheim co-authored an article in the Neocon Project for a New American Century entitled, "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces, and Resources for a New Century." This article, on page 51, states:

"The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor."

Thus is established means, motive, and opportunity, the three pillars of establishing criminal guilt. (Wikipedia) If Zakheim is not the mastermind, at a bare minimum, he's deeply culpable or complicit, as are Rumsfeld, Rice, Bush, Cheney, etc. (See http://ArrestConspirators.com) They've committed coup, usurping freedom with their fear tactics to bring in a police state.

What does this have to do with free energy? The same nefarious forces behind 9/11 and its cover-up, are also behind the suppression of the emergence of free energy technologies that would empower the individual and eliminate our dependence on a central government and the largest industry in the world: oil. The emergence of any one of the extreme energy breakthroughs will be a revolutionary act against this conspiracy, empowering the people and spoiling the conspirator's plans to wreck the world economy to bring in their global police state.

# # #

This story is also published at BeforeItsNews.

Credit
I was alerted to this by William Alek, whose recent radio interview talked about "The Mastermind behind 9/11".

Links
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlNQTG8B6hw - Dov Zakheim 9 11 Mastermind
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91CBqI38Sdk - 9/11 Aircraft Technologies - Dov Zakheim (AlienScientist))
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_S._Zakheim
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Planning_Corporation
http://www.sysplan.com/ - SPC official website
http://www.sysplan.com/capabilities/radar/cts/index.html - description of remote control capability
http://www.oilempire.us/lihop-mihop.html#hijackers - At some point, the masterminds and their agents will hijack the plot from the would-be hijackers, to make sure it happens. You won't risk the whole game on the ability of amateurs to get away with it, you will help them along or even replace them (with a remote control hijacking, for example). But it's best to have "real terrorists" in play. They leave a more solid trail of evidence internationally.

What You Can Do
Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources.
Bring Dov Zakheim and other 9/11 culprits before the proper tribunal to be proven and brought to justice.
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy sector.
See also
Resources at PESWiki.com

Directory:9/11_Conspiracy
Directory:Conspiracy
News:Conspiracy
Directory:Suppression
More stories by Sterling D. Allan
PESN (Pure Energy Systems News) - Feature stories on cutting-edge, clean energy technology.
Free Energy News (.com) - Daily cutting-edge, clean energy technology news from around the world
PESWiki Latest - Newest feature pages in the publicly-editable energy directory.
This Week in Free Energy™ - Ten-minute recap each Sunday, 7:50 - 8:00 pm Mountain.
Free Energy Now (.net) - in-depth interviews

FULL REPORT?/

---------------------
9/11 INFO AND LINKS....
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc.htm

Click here to receive daily updates